مقایسه جایگاه زن در تربیت اخلاقی براساس آرای نل نادینگز و فارابی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی برنامه ریزی درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد سقز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سقز، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی برنامه‌ریزی درسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.

3 کارشناسی آموزش ابتدایی، آموزگار، آموزش و پرورش شهرستان سقز.

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با هدف بررسی جایگاه زن در تربیت اخلاقی براساس آرای نادینگز و فارابی به انجام رسیده است. رویکرد غمخواری در تربیت اخلاقی متاثر از دیدگاه نل‌نادینگز از فیلسوفان معاصر مغرب زمین است که ریشه در جنبش فمینیستی دارد. دیدگاه فارابی نیز در تربیت اخلاقی ریشه در قرآن و آثار فلاسفه اسلامی و یونانی دارد. پژوهش از نوع مطالعات تطبیقی بوده و با توجه به هدف از روش انتقادی تحلیلی جهت پاسخ به پرسش های پژوهش استفاده شده است.برای رسیدن به هدف ابتدا آرای تربیتی نادینگز و فارابی مورد کاوش قرار گرفته و سپس تربیت اخلاقی و زن در اندیشه این دو فیلسوف بررسی شده است. هم نادینگز و هم فارابی در دیدگاه خود توجه ویژه‌ای به جایگاه زن دارند و بر اهمیت عشق و محبت در تربیت تاکید دارند. نادینگز برخلاف فارابی رویکردی جنسیتی به اخلاق و تربیت اخلاقی دارد و نگاه وی معطوف به انسان و فارغ از معنویات است، اما فارابی در تفاضل بین ابنا بشر، جنسیت را محور تفکیک قرار نمی‌دهد، بلکه نگرشی انسانی به ماهو انسان دارد و برخلاف نادینگز مانند دیگر اندیشمندان مسلمان بر معنویات تاکید ویژه‌ای دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the position of women in moral education based on Nel Nadings and Farabi opinions

نویسندگان [English]

  • wirya nawrozi 1
  • Faranak Assadi sharif 2
  • Roya Faryadvatan 2
  • Samireh Moradi 3
1 PhD Student of Curriculum, Department of Educational Sciences, Saghez Branch, Islamic Azad university (IAU), Saghez, Iran
2 Ph.D Student, Curriculum Development, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 BA, elementary education, Saqqez city education
چکیده [English]

The current research was conducted to investigate women’s position in education based on the views of Nel Nadings and Farabi. Ending’s approach to moral education is influenced by Nel Nading's view of contemporary Western philosophers, which is rooted in the feminist movement. Farabi's view on moral education is rooted in the Qur'an and the works of Islamic and Greek philosophers.The research is a comparative study, and according to the goal, a critical-analytical method has been used to answer the research questions. To achieve the goal, the educational views of Nadings and Farabi were first explored, and then moral education and women in thought. These two philosophers are examined.Both Nadings and Farabi pay special attention to the position of women and emphasize the importance of love and affection in education. Unlike Farabi, Nuddings has a gender approach to ethics and moral education, and his view is focused on human beings and free from spirituality, but Farabi does not make gender the focus of differentiation in the difference between human beings but has a human attitude towards human beings and Unlike Nadings, like other Muslim thinkers, he has a special emphasis on spirituality.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nadings
  • Farabi
  • moral education
  • woman
[1] Hasani M, Vojdani F.  A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Books on Social Studies in Primary Schools from the Moral Educational Viewpoint, Biquarterly Journal of Islamic Education, 2017;  12(25):29-54.
[2]Dirbaz A, Aslani M. A critical inquiry of contemporary western philosopher's definition of morality, Ethical Research, 2016; 6(3): 83
[3]   Mohammadzadeh AA, Kalantary S. Analyzing the Relationship between the Approach of Islamic Philosophical Ethics and Contemporary Ethics, Akhlagh Research Extension Quarterly, 2020; 10(38): 137-154.
[4] Amar F, Delbari SM, Shokrani Y, Tabatabai-Najad SS (members of the authoring group). The teacher's book of gifts from the sky, 6th elementary school, Ministry of Education, Educational Research and Planning Organization, Offset. 2011.
[5] Sharifi M, MirShahab Jafari E Analyzing Moral Education Curriculum in Iran and Some other Countries, 2016; 7(19): 115.
[6] Kavandi S. The Principles of Farabi's Educational Thought,  2012; 3(9): 45
[7] Kaveshi Z, Mousapour N, Mohebbi A, Armand M. Identification of the Dimensions and Components of Moral Education through a Social Approach and Developing a Conceptual Model for Elementary Education,  2018; 3(7): 117-142.
[8] Vojdani F, Imani Naeini M, Sadeqzadeh Ghamsari R. A Critical Study of Three Prevalent Perspectives towards Moral Education Based on Allameh Tabatabai's Point of View, Biennial Journal Educational Science from Islamic Point of View, 2015; 2(1):43.
[9] Ahmadi Hedayat H, Ahmadabadi Arani N, Mirza Mohammadi MH.  An Analysis and Critique of the Educational-Philosophical Viewpoints of Noddings from the Perspective of Islamic Education, 2017; 8(2): 105.
[10]Bagheri Kh. Philosophical foundations of feminism, Tehran, Ministry of Science, Al-Zahra University. 2003. [Persian]
[11] Abu Nasr Muhammad bin Muhammad F. Thoughts of the people of Madinah Fadzaleh, translated and edited by SJ Sajjadi, Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Tehran. 2000. [Persian]
[12] Mirzamohammadi MH. Farabi's educational philosophy, Tehran, Shahid University. 2013.
[13] Davari Ardakani R. Farabi, Qiyam printing, Tehran, new design. 1995. [Persian]
[14] Hashemi F, Noroozi A. An Analysis of Moral Training in Farabi's viewpoint, 2011; 2(5): 95.
[15]Mesbah Yazdi MT. Criticism of Ethical School, Qom, Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute, first. 2005. [Persian]
[16] Mansureh Bakhshi, Majid Sadeghi Hasanabadi, Seyed Mahdi Emami Jomeh, (2018). Place of Woman in Social System and Family from the Point of View of Farabi, Avicenna and Khajeh Nasir, Avicennian Philosophy, 22(59), 5-25.
[17] Ghaffari A. Reviewing and criticizing the approaches of virtue and sadness in moral education, doctoral thesis, Tarbiat Modares University. 2012.
[18] MovahedKhosro Bagheri S, Salahshoori A. Comparative Study Imam Mohammad Ghazali's and Nodding's Views on Moral Education, Journal of Religious Thought, 2008; 8(27): 39.
[19] Ahmadi Q. 2017. A Critical Study on Feminism based on Morality, Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics, 9(33), 115.
 [20]Flinders, David J. Nel Noddings, from Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education(from Piaget to the present), joy A. Palmer (ed), London. Routledge. 2001: 210-215.
[21] Noddings N. The Challenge to Care in Schools: an alternative Approach to Education, Columbia University: Teachers College Press. 2005.
[22] Fathi Vajargah K. Curriculum towards a new identity, Tehran, Aish. 2012.
[23] Misbah M. the foundation of ethics; A new method in teaching moral philosophy, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute, third edition. 2005. [Persian]
[24] Ghazazani E. A Glimpse at Mystical and Critical Aesthetics in the Fifth Tale in Mowlana's Masnavi Ma'navi. Islamic Mysticism, 2017;  12(47).
[25] Noddings N. Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: the University of California Press. 2002.
[26] Noddings N. The Challenge to Care in Schools, New York: Teachers College Press. 1992.
[27] Barkhordari R. Nell Noddings. Iranian encyclopedia of curriculum, www.daneshnamehicsa.ir. 2015.
[28] Ghafari A. Ethics and Moral Education from viewpoint of Ethic of Care: An Alternative to Kohlbergian approach. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling, 2005; 06(2).
[29] Holmes, Robert L. “Basic Moral Philosophy”, USA, Wadsworth Publishing Company. 1998.
[30] Seyf SM.  A Reflection into Martin Buber's Dialogical Philosophy, 2007; 56:43.
[31] Noddings N. Care and Moral Education, in Wendy Kohli (ed), Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education, London: Routledge. 1995.
[32]  Corben H. History of Islamic Philosophy, translated by Dr. Seyed Asadullah Mobasheri, Tehran, Amir Kabir. 2013.
[33] Research institute of the field and university. Philosophy of Education, Tehran, Semit. 2005; (1). [Persian]
[34]  Davari Ardakani R. Farabi, Philosopher of Culture, Sokhon Publications, 4th edition, 2010; 316. [Persian]
[35] Rafiee B. Al- farabi: a philosopher of education, Education Journal, 2013; 20(1): 29-50.
[36]  Eslamian M, Keshti Aray N, Golestani SH. Analysis of Educational ideas of Farabi, the Founder of Islamic Philosophy, 2013.
[37]  Taheri Gh, Nekomanesh N. A bunasr Faarabi and rumi on education, 2017; 1(1): 153-177.
[38]  Mohajernia M. Farabi's political philosophy, Tehran, Al-Zahra University Press. 1380.
 [39] Barkhordari Z, khoshdoni S. Contemporary Wisdom, 2016; 7(2): 93-117.
[40]  Taghizadeh Davari M.  Examining commonalities and differences in the social philosophy of Plato and Farabi, Philosophical-Theological Research Quarterly, 2005; 7(3): 131.
[41]  Chateau J. Great teachers, translated by Gholamhossein Shakohi, Tehran, Tehran University Press. 1999. [Persian]
[42]  Nuddings N. Perspectives of the philosophy of education and training, translated by Ramzan Bakhrodi, Tehran, first edition. 2014.
[43] Adel Zadeh F, Norouzi RA, Rahmani J. Principles of Rational Education In Farabi's Thought, 2019;27(44): 5-24.
 [44] Zabihi M. Practical wisdom from the point of view of three Muslim philosophers: Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Mulla Sadra, Tehran, Samt. 2017.
[45]  Ahmadi Hedayat H, Ahmadabadi Arani N, Naderi M. A Critical Analysis of Noddings’ Moral Education Based on Allame Tabataba'i’s Viewpoint, Marifat, .  2020; 28(9): 77
[46]  Jabri-Moghadam AA. Farabi's educational philosophy, doctoral thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran. 2003. [Persian]