پدیدار شناسایی راهبرد های بهبود تجارب معلمان در مواجهه با تغییر برنامه درسی

زینتی, بهرام; قادری, مصطفی; ملکی, حسن

doi:10.22034/naes.2021.302083.1147

پدیدار شناسایی راهبرد های بهبود تجارب معلمان در مواجهه با تغییر برنامه درسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ کارشناس ارشد مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

² دانشیار گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

³ استاد گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

10.22034/naes.2021.302083.1147

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف پدیدار شناسایی راهبرد های بهبود تجارب معلمان در مواجهه با تغییر برنامه درسی انجام گرفت. داده های این پژوهش به روش پدیدار شناسی که یک رویکرد کیفی است، به دو صورت مشاهده ای و مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند جمع آوری گردید. در بخش مصاحبه ی از 20 نفر از معلمان مقطع ابتدایی و متوسطه(دوره اول و دوم) شهرستان نظرآباد در استان البرز که به شیوه نمونه گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند، استفاده شد. پس از جمع آوری و تحلیل داده ها که از طریق کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام گرفت ، نقشه مفهومی از تحلیل داده ها ارائه گردید. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل دادهای این پژوهش در 3 مقوله اصلی که شامل مقوله های فرعی نیز هستند، بیان گردید که عبارتند از: 1) پشتیبانی دانشی - مهارتی تغییر(دوره های دانش افزایی،بسته های یاددهی – یادگیری)، 2) تقویت نقش معلمان در تغییر(شایستگی معلم در نهادینه ساختن تغییر، علاقه و انگیزه معلم، مشارکت معلمان) و 3) بهبود محیط یاددهی - یادگیری متناسب با تغییر(تراکم فراگیران در کلاس، تناسب معماری فضای یادگیری با تغییر).

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

برنامه ریزی درسی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify strategies to improve teachers' experiences in the face of curriculum change

نویسندگان [English]

Bahram Zinati ¹
Mostafa ghaderi ²
Hasan Malaki ³

¹ Master of Curriculum, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

² Associate Professor of Curriculum, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

³ Professor of Curriculum, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to identify strategies to improve teachers' experiences in the face of curriculum change. The data of this study were collected by phenomenological method, which is a qualitative approach, in the form of observational and semi-structured interviews. In the interview section, 20 primary and secondary school teachers (first and second period) of Nazarabad city in Alborz province, who were selected by purposive sampling, were used. After data collection and analysis, which was done through open, axial and selective coding, a concept map of data analysis was presented. The results of data analysis of this research were expressed in 3 main categories, which also include sub-categories, which are: 1) knowledge-skills change support (knowledge courses, teaching-learning packages), 2) strengthening the role of teachers In change (teacher competence in institutionalizing change, teacher interest and motivation, teacher participation) and 3) Improving the teaching-learning environment commensurate with change (density of learners in the classroom, architectural fit of learning space with change).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

change
teachers
teachers'
experiences
curriculum

مراجع

1- Toh Y, So HJ. ICT reform initiatives in Singapore schools: a complexity theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2011; 12(3): 349-357.

2- Parsa A. A Survey of Teachers' Attitudes and Behavioral Tendencies regarding the Advancement of New Curricula, Quarterly Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2007; 1 (4), 103-138.

3- National Curriculum Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Secretary of the National Curriculum Production Plan, Tehran, Educational Research and Planning Organization of the Ministry of Education, 2011.

4- Safi A, Primary education, secondary and high school education, Tehran, Samat Publications, 2011.

5- Park M, Sung YK. Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: What can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2013; 33(1): 15–33.

6-Zarghani A, Khandaghi A, Shabani B. Change as a human phenomenon: desirable change in the process of implementing new curricula from the perspective of teachers, Quarterly Journal of Qualitative Research in the Curriculum, 2017; (9): 44-80.

7- Mohammadi R, Kian M, Ali Asgari M. An Analysis of Teachers' Attitudes Towards Changing the New Reading and Writing Curriculum in the Fourth Grade of Elementary School, Quarterly Journal of Qualitative Research in the Curriculum, 2017; (8): 53-79.

8- Razaqi A, Joulaei N. A Survey of Teachers' Attitudes Towards Changes in Elementary School Textbooks, Second National Conference and First International Conference on New Research in Humanities, Tehran, Vira Capital Institute of Managers, 2015.

9-Peskova K, Spurná M, Knecht P. Teachers’ acceptance of curriculum reform in the Czech Republic: One decade later. CEPS Journal, 2019; 9(2): 73-97.

10-Lorenza LM. Curriculum change and teachers’ responses: a NSW case study. 2018.

11- Constantinescu M. Teachers’ attitudes toward educational changes in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015; 177: 61-64.

12- Fathi Vajargah K. Feasibility study of teachers' participation in the curriculum planning process in the Iranian education system, Journal of Educational Innovations, 2004.

13- Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. Routledge. 2007.

14- Willis G. Phenomenological research: Bio-global perceptions, translated by Bakhtiar Shabani Varki, in Mahmoud Mehr Mohammadi et al. (Translators), Curriculum study methodology 228-246, Tehran, Samat Publishing, 2010.

15-Fathi Vajargah K. In-service training planning for employees, Tehran, Samat Publishing, 2011.

16- Vaziri Serashk S. Investigating the effect of in-service training on increasing the quality of primary school education in Isfahan, Master Thesis in Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, 2004.

17- Hosseini Khan A, Salarvandiyan S. Rethinking the Teacher's Position and Role in Curriculum Change from the Perspective of Seymour Bernard Cerson and Elliott Eisner, Proceedings of the National Conference on Curriculum Change, Birjand, Birjand University, 2013.

18- Malaki H. Teacher Development Magazine, May, 1994; (101).

19-Glickman CD, Gordon SP, Ross-Gordon JM. Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. Allyn & Bacon/Longman Publishing, a Pearson Education Company, 1760 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02494. Web site: http://www. abacon. com. 2001.

20- Doležalová J. Competencies of teachers and student teachers for the development of reading literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015; 171:519-525.

21- Mitkovska Snezana Jovanova The need of continuous professiona teacher development. astip, Bulevar JNA 4/13. 2010.

22- Meiers M, Ingvarson L. Investigating the links between teacher professional development and student learning outcomes, Vol. 1. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved December. 2006.

23- Huntly H. Teachers’ work: Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 2008; 35(1): 125-145.

24- Stronge JH. Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum Development. 2002.

25- Elbaz F. Research on teacher's knowledge: The evolution of a discourse. J. Curriculum Studies, 1991;23(1): 1-19.

26- Uline C, Tschannen‐Moran M. The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of educational administration. 2008.