A new approach to children's education quarterly

A new approach to children's education quarterly

Investigating the Effectiveness of an Auditory Rehabilitation Program on Speech Development of Preschool Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Doctoral student, Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran
3 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran
4 Professor, Department of Psychology, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an auditory verbal rehabilitation program on speech development performance in preschool children with cochlear implants in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. This was an experimental study using a pre-test and post-test design with a control group. The sample consisted of 24 deaf children (12 in the experimental group and 12 in the control group). The sampling method was purposeful and convenience sampling. The main tool for assessing speech development performance in deaf children was the Speech Clarity Rating Scale. This scale was developed in 1998 by Allen and colleagues to assess the speech production of children. The experimental group received auditory verbal rehabilitation training (12 sessions lasting 45 minutes, 2 or 3 times a week), while the control group received no intervention. The measurement tools included speech development questionnaires administered at both pre-test and post-test stages. The data were analyzed using SPSS software and covariance analysis. After six months of implementing the rehabilitation program, the findings showed that the average speech development scores for the control group were 2.92 in the pre-test phase and 2.85 in the post-test phase, while for the experimental group, the scores were 3.17 in the pre-test phase and 3.58 in the post-test phase. The results of the one-way analysis of variance of the speech development scores before the training indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups (experimental and control) before the intervention (P > 0.05). The one-way analysis of covariance showed that after adjusting for the pre-test effects, there was a significant difference in the post-test mean scores between the experimental and control groups (P < 0.01). The effect size of this difference was 0.61, meaning that 61% of the variance in speech development was attributable to the group differences. Finally, the adjusted mean post-test speech development scores revealed that the experimental group (3.48) performed better than the control group (2.94) in the post-test. On the other hand, it can be said that the active participation of parents in the therapeutic process accelerated speech learning and improved the child's performance in natural environments. These findings suggest that the verbal auditory rehabilitation program can be an effective tool for improving the speech and language skills of deaf children in various regions, including the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
Keywords

Subjects


Abbasian Nik, Z., Hassanzadeh, S., Farhadi, M., & Afrooz, G. (2017). The Effect of Distance Learning of the Family-Based Auditory Rehabilitation Program of Navaysh on the Development of Social and Language Skills of Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants. Disability Studies, 11-1. [Persian]
Akçakaya, M. (2021). The effectiveness of auditory-verbal therapy in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Cochlear Implantation and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 45–56.
Allen, C., Nikolopoulos, T. P., Dyar, D., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (2001). Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol, 22(5), 631–633.
Allen, M. C., Nikolopoulos, T. P., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (1998). Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. American Journal of Otology, 19(6), 742–746.
Binos, P., Nirgianaki, E., & Psillas, G. (2021). How effective is auditory-verbal therapy (AVT) for building language development of children with cochlear implants? A systematic review. Life, 11(3), 239.
Chatterjee, N., Chatterjee, I., & Sarkar, A. (2019). Impact of auditory verbal therapy in children with cochlear implants. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 27(3), 204–212.
Curtin, M., Dirks, E., Cruice, M., Herman, R., Newman, L., Rodgers, L., & Morgan, G. (2021). Assessing parent behaviors in parent–child interactions with deaf and hard of hearing infants aged 0–3 years: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(15), 3345.
DeBonis, D., & Donohue, C. (2024). Survey of audiology: Fundamentals for audiologists and health professionals. CRC Press.
Ghasemi, M. (2016). Designing a comprehensive rehabilitation program for central auditory processing and examining its effectiveness on reading fluency, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension in dyslexic students. PhD thesis, University of Tehran. [Persian]
Grigorakis, I., & Manolitsis, G. (2021). Longitudinal effects of different aspects of morphological awareness skills on early spelling development. Reading and Writing, 34(4), 945–979.
Hassanzadeh, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Auditory Perception Performance Classification Scale and Speech Clarity Rating Scale in Deaf Prelingual Children with Cochlear Implants. Audiology. (6)23, 84-76. [Persian]
Hudson, M. W., & DeRuiter, M. (2023). Professional issues in speech-language pathology and audiology. Plural Publishing.
Jadi-Franco, G., et al. (2020). The effectiveness of auditory-verbal therapy in improving speech perception in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Clinical Audiology, 58(5), 302–315.
Kanellopoulos, A. K., & Costello, S. E. (2024). The effects of prolonged pacifier use on language development in infants and toddlers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1349323.
Kepa, P., & Danser, M. (2016). Systematic review of auditory-verbal therapy in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Hearing Science, 34(5), 45–57.
Percy-Smith, L., Wischmann, S., Josvassen, J. L., Schiøth, C., & Cayé-Thomasen, P. (2021). Language development for the new generation of children with hearing impairment. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(11), 2350.
Quittner, A. L., Leibach, P., & Marciel, K. (2004). The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: New methods to assess cognitive and behavioral development. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(5), 547-555.
Shirane, M., Ganaha, A., Nakashima, T., Shimoara, S., Yasunaga, T., Ichihara, S., ... & Tono, T. (2020). Comprehensive hearing care network for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss: 8 years’ experience in Miyazaki. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 131, 109881.
Sivertsen, E. B., & Sandvik, S. S. (2017). Intelligibility scales in the assessment of speech in cochlear implant recipients. International Journal of Audiology, 56(10), 687–693.
Tayran Niknejad, H; Sharifi, S; and Ghasemi, M. M. (2017). Evaluation of Music and Play-Based Auditory-Voice Therapy on Language Skills of Hearing Impaired Children. Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, 6 (2), 15-26. [Persian]
Terlektsi, E., Kreppner, J., Mahon, M., Worsfold, S., & Kennedy, C. R. (2020). Peer relationship experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescents. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(2), 153–166.
WHO. (2021). Deafness and hearing loss. Retrieved February 28, 2020, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
Wilkinson, A. S., & Brinton, J. C. (2003). Speech intelligibility rating of cochlear implanted children: Inter-rater reliability. Cochlear Implants International, 4(1), 22–30.
Zhang, F., Underwood, G., McGuire, K., Liang, C., Moore, D. R., & Fu, Q. J. (2019). Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 379, 12–20
Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23
Spring 2025
Pages 117-126

  • Receive Date 29 December 2024
  • Revise Date 15 January 2025
  • Accept Date 14 February 2025
  • First Publish Date 14 February 2025
  • Publish Date 22 May 2025