A new approach to children's education quarterly

A new approach to children's education quarterly

providing a model for preparing the analysis and validation of educational content through distance education in higher education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Doctoral student of Curriculum Planning, Tehran Science and Research Uni,,Iran
2 Assistant Professor Faculty: Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Tehran Azad University, Science and Research Unit
Abstract
The aim of the current research is to provide a model for preparing, analyzing and validating educational content through distance education in higher education, which is done by examining the strengths and weaknesses of previous models and using a unified approach to the presentation. The mentioned model has paid.

M: In this research, previous models were analyzed and criticized, their strengths and weaknesses were examined, and then the new model was presented with a unified approach.

In the analysis of the articles, according to the fact that the research was aimed at obtaining a model for preparing the analysis and validation of the educational content, the Volcott theme analysis method was used, and also the research method based on the contextual theory was used. Qualitative questions are raised instead of presenting hypotheses

F: The findings of this research also indicate that educational design models for distance learning do not include all the elements required in a comprehensive educational design program, and this has caused the process of educational design not to be comprehensively considered, as well as previous designers. They have designed their models with an independent approach and this has made it impossible to use all the capacities and facilities in the mentioned process. It should be noted that in this research, the researcher tried to take a completely new and different look at the preparation, analysis and validation of educational content in his new model while using the previous models, as well as the philosophical foundations, features, principles
Keywords

Subjects


Ancuceanu, R., Dinu, M., Hovane , M.V., Anghel, A.I., Popescu, C. V. (2015). A survey of plant iron content-a semi-systematic review. Nutrients, 7(12), 10320-10351.
Birkelund, C. H. (2019). Rare disease thresholds-An analysis of different definitions, laws and arguments (Master's thesis).
Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility.
Cai, J., Youngblood, V. T., Khodyreva, E. A., & Khuziakhmetov, A. N. (2017). Higher education curricula designing on the basis of the regional labour market demands. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2805-2819.
Carnell, B., & Fung, D. (Eds.). (2017). Developing the Higher Education Curriculum: Research-Based Education in Practice. UCL Press.
Diamond, R.M. (1998) Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ernstein, A. and Hankins, F. (2005). Basics, principles and curriculum issues. (Qudsi Akhr's translation). Tehran: Islamic Azad University Press, Faculty of Sciences and Research.
Ganieh, R. M; Briggs, Leslie. J; Wieger, Walter. W. (1970). Principles of educational design, translated by Khadijah Aliabadi. Tehran: Dana. [Persian]
Guadarrama Olivera, L. (2013). Curriculum and Learning Design for Competencies/Outcomes Based Education: A Systemic View.
Hadavand, S. (2008). Validation: Education quality control tool. Tadbir monthly Year 19, No. 204. [Persian]
Herlo, D. (2015). New Trends In Curriculum Design Process For Higher Education. Journal Plus Education, 13(2), 35-40.
Hicks, O. (2007, July). Curriculum in higher education in Australia-Hello. In Enhancing Higher Education, Theory and Scholarship, Proceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference [CD-ROM] (Vol. 8, No. 11).
Hosseini Largani SM, Yadgarzadeh, G.H. (2011). A review of various models of university curriculum design and compilation in higher education: presenting a proposed model for Iranian higher education. Two Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies. Year 11, Number 22, Fall and Winter 1911, 88-91. [Persian]
Khan, M. A., & Law, L. S. (2015). An Integrative Approach to Curriculum Development in Higher Education in the USA: A Theoretical Framework. International Education Studies, 8(3), 66-76.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: Essays on moral development (vol. II). New York: Harper & Row.
Macalister, J. (2010). Investigating teacher attitudes to extensive reading practices in higher education: Why isn’t everyone doing it?. Relc Journal, 41(1), 59-75.
McPhail, G. (2020). The search for deep learning: A curriculum coherence model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1-17. https:// doi.org/ 10.1080/ 00220272. 2020.1748231
McPherson, R & King, K M. (2010). International distance learning in special education: A program evaluation of a US-Ecuador collaboration. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Texas Retrieved November 21, 2018 from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30493/.
Millear, P. M., Greenaway, R., & Schmidt, J. (2017). Using Curriculum Design Principles to Renew Teaching and Learning in Developmental Psychology. In Refereed papers from the 40th HERDSA Annual International Conference (pp. 250-260). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA).
Morrison, Gary. R, Russ, Steven. M. and Camp, Gerald. A. (2004). Designing effective education (4th edition) translated by Gholamhossein Rahimi Dost. (2008). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
O'Neill, G. (2015). Curriculum design in higher education: Theory to practice.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum-Foundations, Principles, and issues Foerth Edition.
Prideaux, D. (2003). Curriculum design. Bmj, 326(7383), 268-270.
Razavi, SA, Nowrozi, D. 2014. Fundamentals of educational design, Tehran: Samt. [Persian]
Reigeluth, C. (Ed.) (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of current status. Vol. 1. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Tyler, R. (2011). The basic principles of curriculum planning and education. (Translated by Ali Taghi Pourzahir). Tehran: Age Publications.
University College Dublin (2018). Curriculum Review and Enhancement Process Steering Committee Final Report. Ireland’s Global University.
Veness, D. (2010). As simple as possible”: the bones of curriculum design. Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney, 1002-1006.
Wolf, P. (2007). Curriculum Development in HigherEducation: Faculty-Driven Processes and Practices. Jossey-Bass
Yazdi, S. V. (2013). Effective employment: A basic objective for curriculum design in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(4), 28-43.
Zarei Zwarki A. (2011). Educational design and learning environments with integrated approach, Educational Psychology Quarterly, Year 8, Number 24, Summer 2019. [Persian]
Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19
Spring 2024
Pages 220-232

  • Receive Date 28 May 2024
  • Revise Date 11 June 2024
  • Accept Date 17 June 2024
  • First Publish Date 17 June 2024
  • Publish Date 21 May 2024