بررسی نقش ذهنیت‌های والدتنبیه گر و کودک آسیب پذیر طرحواره ای در طلاق عاطفی دانشجویان متأهل: نقش تعدیل کننده‌ی سبک‌های مقابله‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی قم

2 دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم

3 دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه واحد علوم تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

10.22034/naes.2022.338556.1188

چکیده

امروزه در بسیاری از جوامع شاهد طلاق عاطفی و طلاق رسمی هستیم که می تواند سبب بروز عوارض منفی جسمانی و روانی در زوجین، کودکان آنها و یا حتی اجتماع شود. در همین راستا پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش ذهنیت های والد تنبیه گر و کودک آسیب پذیر طرحواره ای در طلاق عاطفی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد قم در سال تحصیلی 1399-1400 انجام گرفت.
حجم نمونه ای 298 نفری با روش نمونه گیری در دسترس صورت گرفت. ابزار مورد استفاده عبارت بودند از پرسشنامه طلاق عاطفی گاتمن و مقیاس مقابله با شرایط پر استرس اندلر و پارکر. داده ها پس از جمع آوری با استفاده از روش رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی در قالب نرم افزار SPSS مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت.
نتایج نشان داد که ذهنیت والد تنبیه گر دارای رابطه مثبت و معنادار با سبک مقابله ای هیجان مدار می باشد. همچنین این ذهنیت دارای رابطه منفی و معنادار با سبک مقابله ای مسئله مدار می باشد. ذهنیت والد تنبیه گر دارای رابطه مثبت و معنادار با سبک مقابله اجتنابی می باشد؛ همچنین این ذهنیت دارای رابطه مثبت و معنادار با طلاق عاطفی نیز می‌باشد. ذهنیت کودک آسیب پذیر دارای رابطه مثبت و معنادار با سبک مقابله ای هیجان مدار می باشد. ذهنیت کودک آسیب پذیر دارای رابطه منفی و معنادار با سبک مقابله ای مسئله مدار میباشد. ذهنیت کودک آسیب پذیر دارای رابطه مثبت و معنادار با سبک مقابله اجتنابی می باشد؛ ذهنیت کودک آسیب پذیر دارای رابطه مستقیم و مثبت با طلاق عاطفی می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Role of Parental Discipline and Schematic Vulnerable Child Mentions in Married Students' Emotional Divorce: The Modifying Role of Coping Styles

نویسندگان [English]

  • leila shiri 1
  • hasan mirzahoseini 2
  • masoud rezaei 3
1 Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch
2 Department of Psychology, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
3 , Department of Management and Economic, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Today, in many societies, we see emotional divorce and formal divorce, which can cause negative physical and psychological effects on couples, their children or even society. In this regard, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the role of punitive parent and vulnerable child schemas in emotional divorce among students of Qom Azad University in the academic year 1399-1400.

Methods: The sample size was 298 people by available sampling method. The instruments used were the Guttman Emotional Divorce Questionnaire and the Andler and Parker Stress Scale. Data were collected and analyzed using hierarchical regression method in SPSS software.

Results and Conclusion: The results showed that the mentality of the punishing parent has a positive and significant relationship with the emotion-oriented coping style. Also, this mentality has a negative and significant relationship with the problem-oriented coping style. The mentality of the punishing parent has a positive and significant relationship with the avoidant coping style; This mentality also has a positive and significant direct relationship with emotional divorce. Vulnerable child mentality has a positive and significant relationship with emotion-oriented coping style. Vulnerable child mentality has a negative and significant relationship with problem-oriented coping style. Vulnerable child mentality has a positive and significant relationship with avoidant coping style; Vulnerable child mentality also has a direct and positive relationship with emotional divorce.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Schematic mentalities
  • Coping styles
  • emotional divorce
  • Schema therapy
[1] Alagheband L, Pasha Sharifi H,  , Farzad V, Aghayousefi A. Predicting emotional divorce based on emotional literacy, coping styles, quality of life, excitement mediated by resilience .  Journal of Psychological Sciences. 2020; 19(90):733-743. [Persian]
[2] Safaei H,  Emami A.  Marriage and its dissolution. Seventh edition; University of Tehran Press. 2009. [Persian]
[3] Kanter JB, Proulx CM, Monk JK. Accounting for Divorce in Marital Research: An Application to Growth Mixture Modeling. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2019; 81(2): 520-530.
[4] Mattson R E, Rogge R D, Johnson M D, Davidson E K, Fincham F D. The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2015; 20(2): 328- 355.
[5] Alagheband L, Pasha Sharifi H, Farzad V, Aghayousefi A.  A Model for Predicting Emotional Divorce Based on Emotional Literacy, Coping Styles, Quality of Life, and Excitement Mediated by Emotion Regulation. Journal of Medical School. 2019; 62(4,1):388-402. [Persian]
[6] Gottman J, M. A Theory of Marital Dissolution and Stability. Journal of Family Psychology. 1993; 7(1): 57-75.
[7] Safaei Rad S, Varaste Far A. The Relationship between Marital Conflict and Emotional Divorce of Women Referred to East Tehran Court. Journal of Social Research. 2013; 20:85-106. [Persian]
[8] Barzoki M H, Tavakoll M, Burrage H. Rational-Emotional ‘Divorce’in Iran. Applied Research in Quality of Life.2015; 10(1): 107-122.
[9] Rezaei AM, Mirzade Kouhshahi F, Yaghoubi Torki E.  Couples' emotional interactions and its role in emotional divorce and divorce attempt: A qualitative research. Family Research Quarterly. 2017; 52(13):44-55. [Persian]
[10] Rashid KH, Moradi A. Determining the role of communication variables in predicting emotional divorce. Sociological research. 2017; 16(10):133-151. [Persian]
[11] Shomali Ahmadabadi M, Aghaei Meibodi F, Mohammadi Ahmadabadi N, Barkhordari Ahmadabadi A. The effectiveness of emotional literacy skills training on reducing emotional divorce and loneliness in unfaithful women.  Growth Psychology. 2020; 9(6):67-76. [Persian]
[12] Munday I, Kneebone I, Newton-John T. The language of chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 1-8.
[13] Khoshouei M. The relationship between humor and stress and coping styles in university students. Journal of Education and Learning Studies, Shiraz University. 2009; 1(1):87-102. [Persian]
[14] Cohen J. N, Jensen D, Dryman M T, Heimberg R G. Enmeshment schema and quality of life deficits: The mediating role of social anxiety. J Cog Psychother. 2015;29(1):20-31. 
[15] Lobbestael J, Arntz A, Sieswerda S. Schema modes and childhood abuse in borderline and antisocial personality disorders. J Behav Ther Exp Psych. 2005; 36(3): 240-53.
[16] Hanaei N, Mahmood Aliloo M, Bakhshi Poor Roodsari A, Akbari E. Schematic mentalities, child abuse experiences, and attachment styles in borderline personality disorder.ClinicalPsychologi&Personality(Daneshvar-e-raftar) .2015;13(12):1-11. [Persian]
[17] Gottman JM , DeClaire J. Raising an Emotionally Intelligent Child: The Heart of Parenting. New York: Simon & Schuster.1997.
[18] Ahmadloo M, Zeinali A. Predicting emotional divorce based on diversity, negative perfectionism and insecure attachment in working women in Urmia. Iran Occupational Health.2018; 15(2):59-68. [Persian]
[19] Mami Sh, Askari M. The role of self-differentiation and attachment styles in predicting emotional divorce. Regional Conference on the Pathology of Divorce, Saqez, Islamic Azad University, Saqez Branch. 2014. [Persian]
[20] Mousavi F, Rahimi nejad A. Comparison of interpersonal identities of married men and women according to the status of emotional divorce. Journal Of Applied  Psychological Research. 2015; 6(1):11-23.
[21] Endler NS, Parker JDA. Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990; 58, 844–854.
[22] Hassan shahi MM, Daraei M. The effect of stress coping strategies on students' mental health: The moderating effect of psychological hardiness. Journal of Knowledge and Research in Psychology.2005; 26. [Persian]